Warning: You are using a browser that does not support angularJS. Some site functionality will not be available to you. Please consider updating to a newer version.
FEE.org does not currently support Internet Explorer. Please use a supported browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

The Benefit of Trade Is the Import; The Cost Is the Export

David Boaz

The benefit of trade is the import; the cost is the export.

Politicians just don’t seem to get this.  President Obama’s official statement on “Promoting U.S. Jobs by Increasing Trade and Exports” mentions exports more than 40 times; imports, not once.  His Republican critics agree: Sen. Rob Portman says that a trade agreement “is vital to increasing American exports.”  More colorfully, during the 1996 presidential campaign, Pat Buchanan stood at the port of Baltimore and said, “This harbor is Baltimore is one of the biggest and busiest in the nation.  There needs to be more American goods going out.”

That’s fundamentally mistaken.  We don’t want to send any more of our wealth overseas than we have to in order to acquire goods from overseas.  If Saudi Arabia would give us oil for free, or if South Korea would give us televisions for free, Americans would be better off.  The people and capital that used to produce televisions – or used to produce things that were traded for televisions – could then shift to producing other goods.

This excerpt was taken from David Boaz's 2015 volume, The Libertarian Mind.

Related Articles

{{relArticle.title}}

{{relArticle.author}} - {{relArticle.pub_date | date : 'MMMM dd, yyyy'}} {{relArticle.author}} - {{relArticle.pub_date | date : 'MMMM dd, yyyy'}}
{{article.BodyText}}