All Commentary
Wednesday, July 1, 1964

You Cant Strike Against the Market

Mr. Smith is a businessman in Argentina.

Employers do not determine wages. Most of them would like to. Many of them think they do. But they can’t. Why? Because the mar­ket steps in and holds them rigidly in its grasp.

The market is an abstract con­cept, just as is the center of grav­ity, moment of inertia, or meta-centric height. Abstract thought originates in the minds of genius and is the only key to the secrets of the universe. It is the primary difference between man and ani­mal. Mankind has usually reacted to the innovation of abstract thought with incredulity and ani­mosity. Copernicus, Galileo, New­ton, and Bacon all suffered ridicule and outright persecution for their ideas. Luckily mankind has now been sufficiently conditioned by rapid scientific advancement to accept on faith such things as Einstein’s collapsible time and curvable space. Engineers know that they are bound by the laws of nature.

While physical science now seems to be safe from the preju­dices of mankind, new fields of abstract thought are causing man to react as badly as did his medi­eval ancestors. The field of eco­nomics has become the new intel­lectual battleground, and the concept of market value versus labor value is the abstract con­cept which has literally divided the world.

The true and real value of any economic good is determined by the amount of labor required to give it utility, said Karl Marx. This concept struck an immediate chord of response among workers, who saw themselves as the only creators of wealth, and formed the basis for a flimsy pretext to con­fiscate private property in the name of the workers who had “cre­ated” it. Communists have sought desperately, but vainly, for a mathematical formula which would relate value and labor.

Combination of Cost Factors

The vast majority of worldly wealth is produced by a proper combination of cost factors. The market determines the value of any finished product. It also de­termines the value of each element of cost entering into its produc­tion. The entrepreneur must accept the “going price” of labor as de­termined by the market. Entrepre­neurial ability enters the picture by properly combining cost fac­tors. In this manner, the business­man can use his ingenuity and skill to determine total cost. The difference between this total cost and the market price of his prod­uct constitutes his profit.

By disregarding the concept of the market, communists and so­cialists presume that values can be determined by law. Conse­quently, they insist that it is bet­ter for “disinterested” politicians to determine values than for “self-interested” businessmen.

Self-interest is the basis for all economic stability and is the bal­ance wheel of the market. In the specific task of searching for the market value of an hour of labor, employer and employee face each other on the see-saw of self-inter­est, each free to take or leave the price offered. It would be impossi­ble to come even close to this elu­sive value were it not for the opposing forces of self-interest.

The laborer can enhance the market value of his services through experience, education, and dexterity. The businessman can affect the market value of his prod­uct through improvement of qual­ity and service. This leads to the illusion that they can control the market, either singly or collec­tively. When working deep within the economy, both employee and employer often lose the perspec­tive of the over-all market econ­omy which finally establishes all values. This myopia has proven ideal for the introduction of Marx­ist concepts into Western civiliza­tion.

Supply and Demands Versus the Boss

Today the free market economy is regarded as an impractical the­ory having no place in modern, complex, practical, economics. There is no use in telling the mod­ern laborer that it is not his em­ployer but an abstract market which determines his wages. The answer is as obvious to him as was the flatness of the earth to the medieval man. He knows that the boss determines his wages and that strikes should be directed at him. After all, it is impossible to bargain collectively with a market!

Even the businessman is none too sure. Doesn’t he have a wage committee and a pricing policy? When it comes right down to it, were it not for unions and legisla­tion, all wage and pricing deci­sions would be his. What he fails to realize is that he does not deter­mine wages and prices but is searching for that shifting and nebulous true market value.

No government would attempt to determine, much less control, the center of gravity of all rigid objects, and is content to accept the earth’s center as the focal point of all. Even more ridiculous would be an attempt to determine the value of each human economic interchange for purposes of indi­vidual or group control. The mar­ket value of any economic trans­action is so complex that only the close study and self-interest of the parties involved can hope to ap­proximate it. Only by sweeping away the internal and external barriers which prevent the har­monizing of free interchange can we hope to find humanity’s eco­nomic center of gravity—the free market. And only by realizing that you can’t strike against the mar­ket can we achieve peaceful indus­trial relations.



Dividing the Pie

Wherever the pie is divided by the free market, one thing seems sure: Marx’s surplus value theory will be vetoed. For persons will continue, as they have over the past few centuries in our relatively free United States, to recognize a bargain when they see one. That bargain is tools. Of our total output, perhaps as much as 95 per cent is because of the use of tools. And this is at a cost of only about 15 per cent of total output, as pay to those who have saved to create these tools. That, and not Marx’s concept, is the miracle that creates a surplus of value.

F. A. HARPER, Why Wages Rise