Freeman

ARTICLE

Strike Out? Blame Fast Food

Grocery Chains Are Losing the Competition for Food Sales

SEPTEMBER 01, 1995 by FRANCOIS MELESE

Dr. Melese is Associate Professor of Economics at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.

Thirty-two thousand members of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Union recently walked off their jobs. Mostly made up of employees from the two largest grocery chains in Northern California—Lucky and Safeway—the union had an ambitious goal: to preserve current wages and benefits. While UFCW members walked the picket lines, competing chains (like Nob Hill and Albertsons) were delighted. Union sympathizers and intimidated customers alike flooded their stores. Business was great. Management was mindful, however, that as consolation for a no-strike clause in their clerks’ contracts, many non-striking clerks would automatically secure concessions granted unionized employees. While the union won this battle, saving members’ wages and benefits, it may have lost the war. This and similar unions across the country are likely to strike out in the future, and fast food is partly to blame.

What few realize is that the threat to wages and benefits comes from a radical restructuring in the market for groceries. Top management was late in spotting and responding to two important trends: increased competition from discount and specialty food stores, and the relentless growth of fast-food outlets. To make up for lost time, management needs concessions from union members to better position their stores. Meanwhile, the UFCW is understandably upset with any news that threatens members’ wages and benefits.

It is useful to begin with the awkward position of top management. While some chains suffer from slumping market shares and share prices, they all admit to having some of the finest workers in the industry. So what happened?

The fact is that until recently Lucky and Safeway had a lock on the grocery business in Northern California. In many cases they were the only game in town. Historically, Lucky and Safeway derived their success at the expense of small grocery stores. Taking advantage of economies of scale, large grocery chains offered increased selection and lower prices than small grocers. Squeezing out “mom-and-pop” operations, Lucky and Safeway came to dominate the market.

The fast-food industry started much the same way as did traditional grocery chains. Fast-food chains opened outlets in towns across the country, offering standardized products, consistent service, convenience, and low prices. Customers literally ate it up, and shareholders were thrilled. Local “mom-and-pop” diners were no match. The economies of scale enjoyed by the chain restaurants put many locals out of business.

Today the fast-food business is “mature.” It is intensely competitive, so that anyone with labor costs higher than anyone else has to cut other costs, offer a superior product or service, or go out of business. A similar future lies ahead for grocery chains.

Squeezed by Competition

Traditional grocery chains like Lucky and Safeway are caught in a competitive squeeze. On one side is increased competition from innovative warehouse and discount chains (such as PRICE/COSTCO), and on the other side, competition from specialty and convenience stores (such as Trader Joe’s and 7-11).

In exchange for bulk purchases and do-it-yourself service, warehouse stores offer great food at great prices. Meanwhile, in a busy world with little time for shopping, convenience stores charge somewhat higher prices for convenience. But just as important is the onslaught of the fast-food industry.

Increasingly, grocery stores compete with the likes of Burger King, Wendy’s, Domino’s, Jack-in-the-Box, McDonald’s, Subway, and Taco Bell. The competition is on two levels, and it is intense. The first level is a competition for food sales; the second, a competition for workers. The grocery chains are losing the first battle at the same time they are winning the second.

Let’s start with the competition for food sales. The more fast food people eat, the fewer groceries they buy. Moreover, the groceries they do buy are increasingly purchased at competing discount warehouses or convenience stores. Worse yet, large fast-food chains typically have their own distribution networks, and consequently do not depend on traditional grocery stores.

The problem of increased competition leaves any business with only three choices: improve the product, lower costs, or go out of business. The UFCW strike was a result of top management opting for lower costs. This brings us from competition for food sales to the competition for workers.

Whereas grocery chains are losing the competition for food sales, they are winning the competition for workers. But is it any wonder? Union pay at Lucky and Safeway stores ranges anywhere from $6.75 per hour for “baggers” to well over three times the minimum wage ($16.75 per hour) for “checkers.” Since the companies provide dental coverage, pay 80 percent of medical premiums, and are generous with drug prescriptions (not to mention pension benefits), the effective wage is higher.

So what do baggers and checkers do for this attractive wage-benefits package? Checkers work the register, and baggers bag groceries. In some cases, baggers also take groceries to your car. The job requirements include the ability to: (1) work a cash register, (2) bag groceries. It helps to interact well with customers and to be a team player.

This suggests grocery clerks have more in common with fast-food workers than they do legal secretaries, medical technicians, or other skilled workers who in many cases earn less than the average wage of a unionized grocery clerk.

In fact, at fast-food restaurants like McDonald’s and Burger King, “courtesy clerks” work the register and cook, and in other fast food establishments like Domino’s Pizza, they also deliver food. The job requirements include the ability to: (1) work a cash register, (2) keep track of orders, and (3) cook. It helps to interact well with customers and to be a team player.

On the surface, grocery clerks and fast-food clerks have a lot in common. In fact, one might expect fast-food wages to be higher to compensate for less favorable working conditions. So how are fast-food workers compensated? They make anywhere from the minimum wage ($4.25 per hour) to $8 per hour, with no benefits. So where does that leave union workers? Today’s success may result in tomorrow’s job losses. Failing to cut labor costs, management is forced to turn to labor-saving devices, downsizing the workforce through attrition. This shrinks union membership and, along with it, their bargaining power. Time is not on their side.

Are there any winners? Of course. The big winners are consumers. Due to increased competition, grocery prices have remained remarkably constant in real terms. Meanwhile, fast-food prices have fallen (in real terms) to the point it is not significantly more expensive to eat out than to shop and prepare food.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

September 1995

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

October 2014

Heavily-armed police and their supporters will tell you they need all those armored trucks and heavy guns. It's a dangerous job, not least because Americans have so many guns. But the numbers just don't support these claims: Policing is safer than ever--and it's safer than a lot of common jobs by comparison. Daniel Bier has the analysis. Plus, Iain Murray and Wendy McElroy look at how the Feds are recruiting more and more Americans to do their policework for them.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION