Freeman

ARTICLE

Socialized Medicine

APRIL 01, 1960 by DAN SMOOT

In 1884, Prince Otto von Bis­marck, Chancellor of Germany, in­stituted the first modern program of socialized medicine. It was called compulsory national health insurance.

Bismarck hated communism. His motive in introducing socialized medicine in Germany was to buy the loyalty of the German masses as a means of keeping them from becoming communists. Bismarck adopted "nationalistic socialism to end international socialism"—touse his own words. To use other words: Bismarck was the first leader of a great nation to fight communism by adopting com­munism.

The German citizens paid more for their national compulsory health insurance than they had paid for private insurance before Bismarck came along—and they got less in return.

Bismarck‘s scheme failed miser­ably to provide better medical care for the people of Germany; but it did become an important feature of the German militaristic state; it helped pave the way for Hitler a generation later; and it fur­nished a pattern with which prac­tically every other nation in the West—including America—has experimented.

British Experience

England first started experi­menting with socialized medicine in 1911. The experiments were a failure, as they always have been everywhere.

But government never re­trenches. When government seizes power and money from the people in order to promote their welfare and then makes matters worse for them, government always argues that it didn’t have enough power and money to do enough pro­moting.

In England, for example, when Lloyd George’s rather moderate experiment in the Bismarckian type of national health insurance was abandoned, the nation went all the way into communized medi­cine.

The National Health Program which became the law of England in July 1948 is modeled on the Soviet system created by Lenin.

In less than two years, there were more than a half a million people on the waiting lists for hospitalization, while some forty thousand hospital beds were out of service because of a nurse shortage. The hospital shortage in Britain has become so acute that many mentally deficient and help­less, aged people are unable to secure institutional care. The only effective means of easing the shortage is to deny hospital admis­sion to the old and chronically ill who cannot be discharged once they are admitted.

In industrial centers, some Brit­ish doctors have as many as 4,000 registered patients each. Such doc­tors can give each patient only three minutes per call—three minutes over-all, for consultation, diagnosis, prescription, filling out official forms, and maintaining proper records for governmental inspectors.

Twelve per cent of all British taxes go into the national health program. Thus the wretchedly in­adequate "free" medical services in Britain actually cost the average Englishman considerably more than an American pays for the most expensive private health in­surance and hospitalization plan.

Over and above what the British themselves have put into socialized medicine, one must consider also the billions of dollars which America has pumped into the British economy as loans and out­right gifts. And still the thing is a failure. Why?

Whenever government enters a field of private activity, that field becomes a political battleground. Whenever you mix politics with medicine, doctoring becomes a po­litical instead of a medical activity.

"Something for Nothing"

But the primary reasons for the inevitable failure of socialized medicine can be found in the pa­tients themselves. When people are forced to pay for something, whether they want it or not, they are inclined to use as much of it as they can in an effort to get their money’s worth.

There are endless stories about Englishmen who trade their gov­ernment-issued eyeglasses, wigs, and even false teeth, for beer. There are housewives who trade government-issued medicine for perfume and cigarettes. And there are some who pick up extra money by selling the gold fillings out of their teeth—getting them replaced by government dentists and then selling them again.

Malingerers are people who pre­tend to be sick in order to get sick-pay, social security benefits, free hospitalization, or a rest at gov­ernment expense. Hypochondriacs are people who think they are sick, but aren’t. There are countless thousands of such people. No sys­tem has ever been devised for defi­nitely identifying them, for weed­ing out the unnecessary or unrea­sonable or dishonest demands made upon the medical care serv­ices—no system, that is, except the one existing in a free society where a person must pay his own doctor bill or is controlled by pro­visions of an insurance policy which he himself has bought.

No compulsory health insurance program has found a means to discourage racketeers or petty complainers who make useless trips to the doctor and monopolize professional time that should be spent on people really needing care.

Editor’s Note: The Dan Smoot Report is an 8-page magazine edited and pub­lished weekly by Dan Smoot, P. 0. Box 9611, Lakewood Station, Dallas 14, Texas, $10.00 a year. Mr. Smoot, a former FBI agent and later the radio and television commentator for Facts Forum, has been publishing his own report since 1955, "using fundamen­tal American Principles, as a yard­stick for measuring all important issues."

The above article is an excerpt from his issue of January 25, 1960, which also includes a history of the trend toward socialized medicine in America, a discussion of the Forand Bill, and a review of the sorry results of the medical plan under the compul­sory "welfare program" of the United Mine Workers. Single copies of that issue may be obtained directly from Mr. Smoot or from THE FREEMAN for 25 cents.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

April 1960

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

October 2014

Heavily-armed police and their supporters will tell you they need all those armored trucks and heavy guns. It's a dangerous job, not least because Americans have so many guns. But the numbers just don't support these claims: Policing is safer than ever--and it's safer than a lot of common jobs by comparison. Daniel Bier has the analysis. Plus, Iain Murray and Wendy McElroy look at how the Feds are recruiting more and more Americans to do their policework for them.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION