Freeman

ARTICLE

Early Warning

AUGUST 01, 1971 by NASSAU SENIOR

Observations concerning the failure of the “welfare State” by Nassau Senior, English economist (1790-1864), based on a visit in France about 1850.

Men, whose reasoning faculties are either uncultivated, or per­verted by their feelings or their imaginations, see the great power of the State, and do not perceive its limits. They see it disposes of great resources, and do not per­ceive how easily these resources may be not only exhausted but dried up. They are struck by the contrast between great superfluity and great indigence, between lives shortened by indolence and lives shortened by toil, by wealth squandered unproductively while cultivable lands lie waste and la­bourers ask in vain for employ­ment. When excited by such a spectacle, what is more natural than to propose laws, by which the toil which appears to them exces­sive shall be forbidden, by which the government shall provide the strong with employment and the weak with relief; and obtain the necessary funds, partly from the superfluity of the rich, and partly by taking possession of the pro­ductive instruments which their present owners are too idle or too timid to turn to the best advan­tage? It requires a long train of reasoning to show that the capital on which the miracles of civiliza­tion depend is the slow and pain­ful creation of the economy and enterprise of the few, and of the industry of the many, and is de­stroyed, or driven away, or pre­vented from arising, by any causes which diminish or render insecure the profits of the capitalist, or deaden the activity of the labour­er; and that the State, by reliev­ing idleness, improvidence, or mis­conduct from the punishment, and depriving abstinence and foresight of the reward, which have been provided for them by nature, may indeed destroy wealth, but most certainly will aggravate poverty.

Journals Kempt in France and Italy from 1848 #52.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

August 1971

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

October 2014

Heavily-armed police and their supporters will tell you they need all those armored trucks and heavy guns. It's a dangerous job, not least because Americans have so many guns. But the numbers just don't support these claims: Policing is safer than ever--and it's safer than a lot of common jobs by comparison. Daniel Bier has the analysis. Plus, Iain Murray and Wendy McElroy look at how the Feds are recruiting more and more Americans to do their policework for them.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION