NEWS

FEE Alum Sets ACS Straight on Health Care

DECEMBER 09, 2009

FEE seminar alum Douglas Mackenzie is speaking up to his fellow surgeons in a letter to the chairman of the board of regents of the American College of Surgeons.

“The debate over health care in this country has brought in many players with skin in the game. Your coalition of surgical organizations is one group among many. These many groups include other physician groups, insurance companies, patient advocacy groups, pharma, and the like. I would bet that the individuals in these groups, including yours, want our country to have the best health care system for themselves, their families, and their patients. But look back to the first line of this paragraph. Did the “players with skin in the game” metaphor rankle you at all? It should have. If it did, maybe there is hope that given enough time you could actually learn enough history and economics to understand what is really wrong with our system. I would submit that we do not have a health care problem in this country, but we do most definitely have a government problem in this country.”

Read the full letter.

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited our social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

Image from Shutterstock

Biddle v. Borders on Moral Foundations

Do you believe a free order is justified by one single moral justification or by a number of different moral justifications?