Freeman

ARTICLE

The Case for Panhandling

JULY 01, 1959 by LEONARD E. READ

Often enough it is an alcoholic who sidles up to one on a sidewalk and pleads, "Buddy, can you spare a dime for a cup of coffee?" Oc­casionally, the panhandler shows real initiative, like the one who re­cently accosted me near New York City’s Penn Station, "Buddy, could you gimme the fare to South Carolina?"

Panhandling is a pretty low-grade, demeaning trade into which people sometimes sink, a vocation of last resort. Yet, this type of begging has its relative merit: Those importuned are allowed freedom of choice—to be lenient or not to be lenient. Person-to-per­son begging has far less to con­demn it than does the legalized, "federal-aid" type currently en­dorsed and widely employed by our country’s social, intellectual, polit­ical, and commercial elite, as well as the not so elite! Let us test this startling assertion.

Los Angeles, or any other city, would, under the sidewalk variety of panhandling, place an advertise­ment in a Paducah newspaper—indeed, in papers all over the na­tion—asking alms:

Our sewerage system is in dis­repair! Widows and orphans, rich and poor—from Hilo to Nome, from Bellingham to Key West, from Chula Vista to Bangor—give us, we pray, the fruits of your la­bor. We are not prepared to dis­pose of our own sewage. We no longer wish to stand on our hind legs. So, won’t everyone lend a hand? Have mercy, for how else can weaklings like us survive?

Now, what is wrong with this procedure? Not much, except with the people who make such degrad­ing acknowledgments and confes­sions of weakness. At least, every citizen in the nation would be free to choose how he would respond.

Would the citizens of Los An­geles or any other community, farmers or any other group—un­happy with their economic plight—resort to the panhandling prin­ciple in its pristine form? No, in­deed! That would be too revolting. But, behold! We have found a way to "ennoble" the panhandling principle and to remove all feel­ings of revulsion: Legalize the principle. Allow freedom of choice to no one. Bring the police power of government into play and coerce all citizens throughout the nation into financing the local sewerage system—whether they wish to do so or not.

Has legalization made the action any less degrading? Or restored manhood to the weaklings? There appears to be not a trace of miti­gating evidence.

Sidewalk panhandling allows freedom of choice and causes no inflation. Nor do panhandlers in­jure the economy any more than do others who have retired from productive life. Legalized panhan­dling, on the other hand, allows no freedom of choice and is one of the principal causes of inflation and, thus, is destructive of the economy. Sidewalk panhandling is not nearly as bad as the legalized variety, this being the best case that can be made for panhandling on sidewalks.        

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

July 1959

ABOUT

LEONARD E. READ

Leonard E. Read (1898-1983) was the founder of FEE, and the author of 29 works, including the classic parable “I, Pencil.”

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)

By HENRY HAZLITT

The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


By FREDERIC BASTIAT

Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


By F. A. HAYEK

There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


By JEFFREY A. TUCKER

Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


By LEONARD E. READ

No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)