Medical Care Is Not a Right


This article is reprinted by permission from the January-February ¹969 issue of G. P. Press, published by the Texas Academy of General Practice. Dr. Johnson practices in San Antonio.

Rights are what stout-hearted men supposedly fight for. This muddled definition is probably as good as most people’s understand­ing of this blood-soaked concept. Rights is a word which provokes emotion. Label something a right, play a martial tune, and the le­gions will march to your cause. If your opponents accept your sloppy definitions, victory is yours. Stout­hearted men might do well to iden­tify those rights they adore.

The concept of rights has de­veloped over several centuries. It is a complex body of thought about the nature of man. These ideas have had consequences; they en­abled man to emerge from barbar­ism. The concept, quite properly, has acquired an emotional value. Unfortunately, to most people, the concept is hazy, distorted by those who wish to cash in on its emo­tional power.

Rights, as defined by Burke and Locke, as incorporated in the Dec­laration of Independence, the Fed­eralist Papers, and the writings of others, are the conditions neces­sary for man’s survival according to his nature, as he was designed by God or nature. Man, in order to exist among the other flora and fauna of this planet, has certain requirements. First, he must have a drive to live and continuously act to sustain his life. By his natural design, his special means of sur­vival are: conceptual, volitional thinking; hands designed for tools; and differentiation, enab­ling man to specialize his produc­tive energy and to prosper by trading with one another, each party profiting by the exchange. The conditions such social organi­zation requires are: the free range of each man to think, choose, and act; and to own property, to hold secure the products of his mind and hands for him to consume or save or trade. Men must, to live, assert a claim to these conditions: life, liberty, and ownership. These proper claims are rights. Actions against this system, the molesta­tion of another man’s life, liberty, and property, are wrongs.

No one has a right to anything he must ask permission for or in any way take from another. In interpersonal and societal relation­ships there are many goods and services traded and privileges granted, but there is no "right" to take these from another. In dis­tinguishing rights from privileges one may ask, "provided by whom?" If it is provided by God or nature or by one’s own self, it is a right. If it is provided by someone else, it is a voluntary exchange, a priv­ilege—or theft.

No one has a right to food, wa­ter, shelter, money, or love if he must obtain it at the expense of the owner. Medical care is no more a right than these.

Man rightfully obtains goods and services by producing them from nature or by voluntary ex­change with others. Man may ex­change goods, services, and emo­tional values, but he must trade to obtain them. Otherwise he is a thief acting against human ex­istence.

Medical care is a service traded or a privilege granted—or theft.



Abraham Lincoln

I know the American People are much attached to their Govern­ment; I know they would suffer much for its sake; I know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they would ever think of exchanging it for another. Yet, notwithstanding all this, if the laws be continually despised and disregarded, if their rights to be secure in their persons and property, are held by no better tenure than the caprice of a mob, the alienation of their affections from the Government is the natural consequence; and to that, sooner or later, it must come. 


April 1969

comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required


December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF




Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)


The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)