Coping with Disappointment

Freedom and the price system are key.


In the real world, knowledge is imperfect, incomplete, and impermanent. Thus we can’t know for sure what’s going to happen down the road, either as the result of our action or our inaction. Things change in unpredictable ways all the time. If you like things as they are right now, that will change. If you don’t like the way things are, that also will change.

Nevertheless we habitually impute stability and substance to what we perceive, even though nothing is quite what we think it is. In a way, we have to. We still need to form expectations and plan for the future. And when the unforeseen inevitably happens, it surprises or disappoints us to some degree.

In a world in which knowledge is imperfect, incomplete, and impermanent, the main challenge is not so much how to relish success and pleasant surprises, which of course do happen, but mostly how to cope with disappointment. In the individual context that means, first of all not, clinging to our particular plans or expectations when they don’t work out. In the social context it means, when plans fail to mesh, somehow adjusting them all toward better social cooperation.

Persistence in the Face of Failure

Now, sometimes not accepting failure can lead to success. But it’s also true that a person who stubbornly and obsessively pursues a goal in the face of repeated failure tends to be unhappy or go crazy. And in the context of government policies dealing with larger social groups, such as the nation-state, that kind of persistence in the face of failure can be deadly. It’s the source of injustice and brutality, whether in war (even “necessary” ones) or in domestic interventions.

The inability or unwillingness of governments to adjust to changing conditions at the social level ultimately results in forcing people to do things against their will in the attempt to achieve the impossible, such as equalizing wealth over time while maintaining prosperity, or nation-building after a war. Even more limited interventions require the State to subordinate the individual to so-called collective interests.

For an individual the key to coping with ignorance and imperfection is to adjust in the right direction when expectations are disappointed. That requires wisdom–being a grown up.

The key to coping with ignorance and imperfection for larger social orders, when individual plans don’t dovetail, is to allow people to mutually adjust their plans in the right direction. It requires a well-functioning price system and the freedom to form and break social ties–the former provides the signals with which to spot opportunities, the latter the ability to pursue them. Collectivist central planning, an extreme denial of this, entails a rejection of the very means, free markets, that enable people both to tell when they have failed (losses) and to correct their errors (market entrepreneurship).

Doing the Best One Can

To cope with disappointment, to adjust in the right direction, either as a private person or as a policy maker, is to do the best you can and to embrace the inevitability of disappointment, to accept that nothing comes out exactly as planned, to appreciate the deep beauty in a world that doesn’t exactly conform to our expectations, no matter how superficially ugly or distasteful.

(That by the way is what “wabi-sabi,” the name of my column, means: to see the beauty in things that are imperfect, incomplete, and impermanent. Here’s an early column where I explain why I chose that name.)

For the individual it takes the realization that we have the power to change ourselves. For the policy maker it takes the strength to refrain from dominating others and to let them pursue their own ends, especially when they are contrary to those she prefers–to trust that free people will work things out, however imperfectly, incompletely, or impermanently.

F.A. Hayek once referred to the price system at the heart of a free market, which enables countless individuals to mutually adjust their plans and expectations toward better social cooperation without deliberately aiming to, as “a marvel.” A marvel it is–and though not perfect, still beautiful.



Sandy Ikeda is a professor of economics at Purchase College, SUNY, and the author of The Dynamics of the Mixed Economy: Toward a Theory of Interventionism.

comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required


December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF




Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)


The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)