Freeman

ARTICLE

Cigarette Taxes Are Hazardous to Our Health

NOVEMBER 01, 2002 by LAWRENCE W. REED

"In the great chess-board of human society," wrote Adam Smith in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, "every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might chuse to impress upon it."

With monotonous regularity legislatures are busy fine-tuning the lives and habits of millions of citizens-utterly oblivious, in most cases, to Smith’s time-honored wisdom. As if keeping the peace, dispensing justice, and protecting the nation from foreign aggressors were petty, part-time assignments, nanny-state lawmakers are forever prodding us to moderate or abandon certain pastimes they say aren’t good for us (even if many legislators engage in those very pastimes themselves). And if in the process of altruistically prodding us they make a few bucks for their favorite government program, well, that’s just what the nanny state is really all about anyway.

If Adam Smith were with us today he could point to cigarette taxes as proof of what he wrote more than 200 years ago. Armed with the rhetoric of moral righteousness, the Carry Nations of the cigarette wars are jacking up taxes on smokes higher than smoke itself. It’ll discourage a bad habit, they tell us, as they spend the revenues at least as fast as they roll in.

This past summer New York City raised its municipal cigarette tax from eight cents a pack to $1.50. New York State imposes the nation’s highest per-pack tax, also $1.50, which means that $3 of every $7 pack of cigarettes in the Big Apple goes just for the government’s take at the retail level. Never mind the baked-in hidden taxes from the tobacco farm to the local 7-Eleven that go into the retail price.

When Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed the latest tax hike into law at a news conference on June 30, a citizen tossed him a very cogent inquiry. According to the New York Times, Audrey Silk of Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment asked His Honor, "I know that you love to eat chunky peanut butter with bacon and bananas. How about I come out and start a campaign to tax that bacon that’s going to cause heart disease, and tax that super-chunky peanut butter that’s going to kill you?" After conferring with an expert at his side, the Mayor essentially said that smoking was different because it’s addictive. Besides, the city’s deficit-ridden budget needed the expected $111 million a year the $1.50 per pack would yield.

Who’s really the addict here? I know of many people who have given up smoking. I don’t know of any politicians who have given up on making money from it.

Indeed, federal, state, and local governments are the overwhelming reason why the average price of a pack of cigarettes has doubled in the past five years. In the mid-’90s my own state of Michigan tripled its tax from 25 to 75 cents. In August of this year it added another 50 cents. I hasten to add that my concern is not for my own pocketbook; I’ve never smoked anything but a paycheck. My first concern is personal liberty, which, if it means anything, surely means the right to enjoy risky pursuits like hang-gliding or even smoking as long as your actions don’t aggress against others.

But more to the point, the ever-higher taxes on cigarettes are counterproductive in certain crucially important ways. As Adam Smith suggested, people are going to find ways to do what they want to do even if their friendly congressman would prefer that they didn’t. Cigarette taxes are producing some of the same effects that alcohol prohibition brought in the 1920s and early ’30s and that drug prohibition brings today.

In his 1963 book, How Dry We Were: Prohibition Revisited, Henry Lee explained what happened between 1919 and 1933 when alcohol was banned: The law drove the production and consumption of booze underground, and people who wanted to either make or drink the stuff turned to crime (and amazing creativity) to satisfy their desires. Profits in the trade soared, thanks to the ban itself. Smuggling became an art form. Likewise, today’s endless and costly drug war has produced side effects that even a diehard drug warrior can’t deny: an entire subculture that guarantees both violence and drugs to whoever wants them.

Legal Loophole

And so it is with cigarettes. It will be ever more so if taxes reach prohibitive levels. At least one legal loophole for avoiding the taxes is helping to keep the cigarette trade relatively peaceful for the moment: Indian reservations can sell cigarettes tax-free and sales at their stores and websites are soaring.

Meantime, low-tax, tobacco-growing states like Kentucky and North Carolina are magnets for smugglers who buy smokes there and truck them to high-tax, high-price states like Michigan. Authorities concede that smuggling is on the rise. An untold and growing volume of tax dollars is being spent to fight it.

In a recent commentary for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, researcher James Damask revealed an especially seamy and disturbing side of cigarette-tax evasion. On July 21, 2000, 13 months before the World Trade Center attack, FBI agents raided a house in Charlotte, North Carolina, used as a smuggling base. Inside they found cash, weapons (including shotguns, rifles, and an AK-47), documents written in Arabic-and cigarettes. Lots of cigarettes. Why? Because, Damask says, "the operation exploited the tax differential between North Carolina, which has low cigarette taxes at 5 cents a pack, and Michigan, with high taxes at 75 cents a pack" (now $1.25).

Apparently, the smugglers would drive the 680 miles from Charlotte to Detroit in a rented van with 800 to 1,500 cartons of cigarettes purchased with cash in North Carolina. The cigarettes would then be sold to convenience stores in Detroit, which sold them to customers. Authorities say that each trip-which required absolutely no special skills for the 13-hour drive-would net $3,000 to $10,000. The profits would then be shuttled back to Charlotte. The homeowner and recipient of the profits was a man believed to have ties to foreign terrorist organizations.

The lesson? Like Prohibition, high taxes lead to big profit opportunities for people who break the law, which leads to smuggling, which in turn invites some pretty nasty people into the business. Politicians who say they’re helping our health by taxing cigarettes so heavily are not counting all the costs of their effort with as much care as they count their tax revenue. And Adam Smith was right as rain.

Lawrence Reed is president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy (www.mackinac.org), a free-market research and educational organization in Midland, Michigan.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

November 2002

ABOUT

LAWRENCE W. REED

Lawrence W. (“Larry”) Reed became president of FEE in 2008 after serving as chairman of its board of trustees in the 1990s and both writing and speaking for FEE since the late 1970s. Prior to becoming FEE’s president, he served for 20 years as president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, Michigan. He also taught economics full-time from 1977 to 1984 at Northwood University in Michigan and chaired its department of economics from 1982 to 1984.

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)

By HENRY HAZLITT

The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


By FREDERIC BASTIAT

Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


By F. A. HAYEK

There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


By JEFFREY A. TUCKER

Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


By LEONARD E. READ

No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)