Freeman

ARTICLE

Answering Some Questions About--The Remnant

APRIL 01, 1960 by EDMUND OPITZ

Editor’s Note: Each member of the senior staff of FEE has certain assigned chores, but otherwise he is pretty much at liberty to deploy his time and energy according to his own inclinations and experi­ence. One member of the staff is a clergyman with extensive con­tacts among the ministry of the various denominations. Several years ago he helped launch a cleri­cal fellowship, "nondenominational in scope, scholarly in interest, and country-wide." A recent memo­randum sent to the members may be of interest to readers of THE FREEMAN. For further information address The Remnant, 30 South Broadway, Irvington, New York.

What is The Remnant?

The Remnant is a fellowship of churchmen who seek better ways of bringing their religious convictions to bear upon the problems of contemporary so­ciety. Our institutions and our way of life, we believe, are inti­mately related to the basic dogmas of Christianity. From this source we derive our convictions as to the meaning of life, the nature of man, the moral order, and the rights and responsibilities of in­dividuals. The American system which has nurtured us was, de­spite its faults and contradictions, a projection of our religious herit­age. The original American equa­tion had a built-in religious content, but that equation ceases to balance as the religious factors are leached out of it. Their rehabil­itation is our major concern.

The problem of relating religion and society was prematurely settled in the minds of those who, in recent generations embraced such slogans as: "Christianity is the religion of which socialism is the practice." Now that socialism has backfired, this mentality de­clares that religion has no rele­vance to social problems—except as the churches successfully enter the game of power politics. The Remnant will be of little interest to those satisfied by this "answer." But for those who are still asking questions it seeks to work quietly, wherever there are lines of com­munication, for a healthier rela­tionship between the inner life of individuals and the structures of public life.

Who belongs?

Ministers, mostly—those who put a premium on liberty. A man hears about The Remnant and expresses interest. A plate is cut and his name goes on the mailing list, numbering now about 250 names. This list is strictly private, as is the roster of participants at any given func­tion. No one should be exposed to possibly unwanted personal or mail contacts merely because he is one of The Remnant.

Members of the fellowship are not asked to subscribe to any plat­form or take part in any action program. This is not a public or­ganization, and members are as­sured that no one is authorized to make pronouncements in their name or on behalf of The Remnant. Many shades of theological opinion are represented, as well as various denominational attachments. Most of the men are parish ministers; some from big important churches, others from small important churches. There are seminary deans and professors, college presi­dents, editors of religious journals, and a few men from church or­ganizations. Also, there are several interested laymen.

Members of The Remnant hold a wide variety of economic and political views. Most of them would feel that popular labels are not enlightening, but if the matter were pressed, they would probably admit to feeling less uncomfortable with such labels as "conservative," "libertarian," or "right wing," than with any other. But then they would go on to explain to the labeler that they are not much interested in merely promoting the orthodoxy he presumably con­jures up in his own mind by his act of labeling. It’s understanding they’re after, and to get this they are willing to dig beneath labels. The vocabulary we are forced to use in the discussion of social problems is loaded with charged words and carries echoes of dead controversies. Thus the necessity of patient redefinition and exposi­tion.

How does it operate?

The Remnant has held several three-day semi­nars and a number of luncheon meetings. Each has been built around some outstanding scholar or scholars, men whose main con­tribution is in such fields as politi­cal philosophy or economics but whose thinking has a religious di­mension. These meetings are by invitation only; they are private, off the record, tentative, and ex­ploratory. No resolutions are passed; no action is taken to com­mit the group. We meet to work on ourselves. Occasionally, per­haps, we "work over" each other!

Each participant at a meeting receives an inscribed copy of one of the lecturer’s books; and, from time to time, books and pamphlets are offered to the mailing list.

The Remnant has no president, no vice-president, no treasurer. It has a volunteer secretary.

This is not the only way to run a railroad, as the saying goes. For those who prefer them there are numerous organizations struc­tured along quite different lines; tightly knit, wired for sound, geared for direct action. These are not disparaged, but it is here urged that men may think and act significantly in other ways.

How is it supported?

The future is, of course, problematic. We are not endowed. The major costs of past meetings nave been met by grants from a Michigan foundation, with an assist from a foundation in Illi­nois. We would welcome support from other sources as well.

In the initial phase, I drew up a plan for a clerical fellowship to encourage a better understanding of the contemporary social impli­cations of Christianity. Then a proposal was made to hold a con­ference along these lines in the winter of 1957-58. To get help with the cost of such a conference I turned to several foundations. A grant was made, and the meeting held in Rye, New York, January 6-9, 1958. Subsequent grants have underwritten the costs of later meetings. Future meetings will similarly have to rely on whatever interest and support The Remnant program may generate.

Since The Remnant is organized informally, with neither staff nor bank account, my employer, The Foundation for Economic Educa­tion, has agreed to act as its fiscal agent. In order that contributions may be subject to an audit, the grants have been made to FEE earmarked "The Remnant," and disbursements have been made by Foundation checks. The money is used only to meet the actual ex­penses of a meeting. No salaries are paid and no one takes junkets around the country on Remnant money. Remnant meetings in the mid- or far-west are scheduled only when I happen to be in the area under other auspices.

What about the name?

"The Remnant" was a rather hasty choice. It is a little tongue-in-cheek, conveys a tiny note of good-natured belligerency, and recog­nizes that our convictions have only a minority acceptance. The name has already gained a con­siderable measure of acceptance, even outside the fellowship.

Who operates it?

The writer of these words sent out the original mem­orandum, October 11, 1957, over his own name. Since that time the communications have been anony­mous, not to evade responsibility for their contents, but rather to reflect the stance proper to such a fellowship as that described in the above paragraphs.

The Foundation for Economic Education has principal claim on my time. I am the book review edi­tor of our monthly publication, THE FREEMAN; besides which I do some writing and some speaking. The Foundation "works within the framework of the spiritual and ethical understanding embodied in the heritage of Western Civiliza­tion. Its conviction is that this heritage, in its social aspects, spells out into the philosophy of limited government and free mar­ket economics. Political liberty and economic freedom, in turn, are im­portant in man’s quest for ma­terial sufficiency and spiritual growth." Incidentally, THE FREE­MAN solicits original articles or sermons from you along these lines. If the manuscript has poten­tial, editorial counsel is available.

THE FREEMAN and other Founda­tion materials are sent out each month to some forty-five thousand persons in all parts of the globe; more than nine thousand people—including the nationals of thirty or so foreign countries—contrib­ute financially to the support of this work.

My background includes con­siderable college work in economics and political science, joined with a degree of affinity for the thinkers in the classic liberal tradition. I retained an interest in these sub­jects during my seminary course and throughout nine years in the parish ministry. Before joining the staff of the Foundation in 1955, I undertook a ministerial conference program over a period of several years.

Long before I knew of the Foun­dation for Economic Education, its president, Leonard E. Read, had become keenly aware of the ethical and religious dimensions of the problem of human liberty. Thus, it is not difficult to under­stand why an ordained minister is on the staff of this organization.

The Foundation assumes no re­sponsibility, financial or otherwise, for The Remnant. We use my office as our "headquarters," I am permitted to take time off now and then for our meetings, my secre­tary volunteers her services for the group, and I am on my own when soliciting contributions for our activities.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

April 1960

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)

By HENRY HAZLITT

The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


By FREDERIC BASTIAT

Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


By F. A. HAYEK

There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


By JEFFREY A. TUCKER

Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


By LEONARD E. READ

No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)