Freeman

ARTICLE

A Year at the Movies

Libertarian Themes Play Out in Several Hollywood Films

DECEMBER 01, 2000 by RAYMOND J. KEATING

It’s been decades since Hollywood regularly produced films celebrating such notions as liberty, individualism, and hard work. However, a few exceptions periodically make it to local movie theaters. Indeed, 2000 turned out to be a relatively good year for watching individuals take risks and fight tyranny on the silver screen.

In Gladiator, for example, Russell Crowe plays a Roman general named Maximus. He not only is a great soldier and warrior, but also is faithful to God, family, and his emperor. His desire after winning the latest military victory is to return to his wife, son, and farm. The filmmakers make a point of clearly noting that Maximus is a man uncorrupted by politics.

However, Maximus’s life is shattered when Commodus, the emperor’s son, murders his own father to gain power and has Maximus’s family butchered. Maximus avoids death himself, but is made a slave and forced to fight as a gladiator.

Commodus, who longed for political power throughout his life, stands out as a glaring example of governmental tyranny and corruption. He is ruthless, perverse, and manipulative, and does not govern according to principle, but instead appeals to the people’s most base instincts. The metaphor for today’s politics is striking.

In the end, Maximus returns to face the corrupt Commodus, not only in the name of justice for his family but also for a more principled, republican form of government.

Similarly, in The Patriot Mel Gibson portrays Benjamin Martin, who also is spurred to action by an attack on his family, this time during the American Revolutionary War.

The Patriot received criticism from both the political left and right when it was released just prior to Independence Day. Some conservatives did not like Martin’s initial unwillingness to go to war against the British. He opposed the tyranny of taxation without representation and favored American independence, but at the beginning of the film would not fight for these ideas. Not only were the memories of his own actions during the French and Indian Wars apparently so painful that he did not wish to shed blood again, but Martin also possessed a strong desire simply to be left alone—in reality, a very American trait.

However, after a ruthless British officer kills one of his sons and takes another away to be hanged, Martin must take action. Eventually, he moves beyond mere revenge as his motive for waging a guerrilla-style war against the British and becomes a true patriot fighting for liberty. In the film’s final epic battle, for example, he puts aside a chance to exact justice for his family in order to pick up the flag and urge on the American rebels in inspiring fashion at a crucial moment.

The strength of The Patriot is its emphasis on family and the great personal sacrifices made by our forebears in securing freedom. Here is a loving father looking to protect his family, and in doing so comes to see the just nature of the American fight for independence. One would think that conservatives would warmly embrace such a portrait.

The political left was aghast to see Gibson’s character hand rifles to two of his young sons, who help in an assault on British soldiers to rescue the son being taken off to be hanged. Martin had taught his sons to shoot—a necessity of the times—and after the attack, he correctly tells his boys that there was “nothing wrong” in what they did.

In today’s era of gun phobia, it should surprise no one that this scene generated controversy. Those crusading against the right to bear arms fail not only to understand the U.S. Constitution and history, but also the simple fact that guns are not inherently evil. Like most other tools and instruments, they can be used for good or bad, depending on who carries the weapon and what his intentions are. The Patriot makes this quite clear when comparing the acts of the ruthless British officer to Martin’s fight for justice and liberty.

X-Men and The Perfect Storm

While Gladiator and The Patriot deal with the past, X-Men is a sci-fi flick about the not-too-distant future, when mutations are appearing more often and are characterized as the next step in human evolution. This film offers a clear anti-intrusive-government message, as well as a celebration of the individual.

Stirring up fear among humans against the Mutants, one U.S. senator calls for a new law to mandate mutant registration, comparing it to federal gun registration. The Mutants oppose this act of invasive government, but their responses split them into two camps. One faction reacts violently and seeks to destroy humans, while the second camp, led by the X-Men, a group of mutant superheroes, looks to work constructively with mankind. So the primary conflict in the film is not between mutants and humans, but between these two groups of mutants—in a way offering an interesting statement about how various minority groups over the years have reacted against discrimination.

Indeed, by emphasizing a group of individuals as outcasts, X-Men serves as a metaphor for issues like race and immigration. But the unmistakable message is one of embracing people as individuals.

The movie is particularly pro-immigration. It is no mere coincidence that the final battle scene takes place on and around the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island, with the newcomer X-Men fighting to save New York City—in fact, mankind—from destruction.

Finally, another big hit of 2000 offers an affectionate look at individuals willing to work hard to make their way in life. After seeing The Perfect Storm, I’ll never complain about the price of fish again. The movie is based on a true story about fishermen out of Gloucester, Massachusetts, who lost their lives during a massive storm in the fall of 1991 while trying to support themselves and their families.

The moviegoer truly gains a feel for the hard and dangerous life of fishermen, and is even treated to a lesson in economics on how a sword boat works. The boat owner, captain, and each member of the crew get paid according to a cut of the final catch. Everybody has strong incentives to work.

While the boat owner in the movie was cast in a less-than-appealing light, overall The Perfect Storm was nothing less than an ode to those who work hard and literally risk everything fishing the open seas.

It is a rare year when those who embrace liberty, immigrants, and hard work can respect, to varying degrees, so many top Hollywood films. Perhaps we should enjoy it while we can.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

December 2000

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required

CURRENT ISSUE

December 2014

Unfortunately, educating people about phenomena that are counterintuitive, not-so-easy to remember, and suggest our individual lack of human control (for starters) can seem like an uphill battle in the war of ideas. So we sally forth into a kind of wilderness, an economic fairyland. We are myth busters in a world where people crave myths more than reality. Why do they so readily embrace untruth? Primarily because the immediate costs of doing so are so low and the psychic benefits are so high.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

Essential Works from FEE

Economics in One Lesson (full text)

By HENRY HAZLITT

The full text of Hazlitt's famed primer on economic principles: read this first!


By FREDERIC BASTIAT

Frederic Bastiat's timeless defense of liberty for all. Once read and understood, nothing ever looks the same.


By F. A. HAYEK

There can be little doubt that man owes some of his greatest suc­cesses in the past to the fact that he has not been able to control so­cial life.


By JEFFREY A. TUCKER

Leonard Read took the lessons of entrepreneurship with him when he started his ideological venture.


By LEONARD E. READ

No one knows how to make a pencil: Leonard Read's classic (Audio, HTML, and PDF)