A Reviewers Notebook: The American Idea
JUNE 01, 1985 by JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
John Chamberlain’s book reviews have been a regular feature of The Freeman since 1950. We are doubly grateful to John and to Henry Regnery for now making available John’s autobiography, A Life with the Printed Word. Copies of this remarkable account of a man and his times—our times—are available at $6.00 from The Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York 10533.
Congressman Jack Kemp’s reputation rests mainly on his supply-side tax legislation, both the Kemp-Roth law that has already been passed and the “fair and simple,” or FAST, fiat tax which he and Senator Kasten have just introduced. But the more technical aspects of fiscal and monetary reform take up something less than half the space in the book that Kemp has made out of his collected speeches. Called The American Idea: Ending Limits to Growth (The American Studies Center, Washington, D.C., 355 pp.), with a foreword by President Ronald Reagan and a preface by Irving Kristol, the book applies the doctrines of the freedom philosophy to practically every aspect of government, from foreign and military policy to the protection of human rights, and from the composition of political parties to the chances for an international conference to restore the gold standard.
Kemp speaks of a coming “American renaissance,” and he is himself a modern renaissance man. His college degree was in physical education, and he began his working life as a third string quarterback for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Later, as a first string quarterback for the Buffalo Bills, he doubled as a labor leader, helping to organize the football players union. When still a football player he chanced upon two books, Friedrich A. Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty and Ludwig von Mises’ Planning for Freedom. These saved him from the journey to the Left that a belief in unionism entailed for many pro-labor partisans in the Walter Reuther period.
From the Playing Field to the Political Route
A Californian who might normally have preferred to return to the Sun Belt after completing a football career in snow country, Kemp was such a favorite with Buffalo fans that he was prevailed upon to remain in the Northeast and run for Congress. He knew that the decline in the steel industry might become his Number One political concern. But he also saw that protectionism would be no permanent cure for Rust Belt or “smokestack industry” troubles.
In one of the foreign policy speeches in The American Idea Kemp says: “Shortly after I became a congressman 12 years ago, I became increasingly aware that the problems which afflicted the depressed Buffalo-area district could not be solved by local projects. Buffalo was suffering from problems of national scope, which required solutions on a national level.”
This perception caused Kemp to behave more like a Senator than a mere Representative. His Buffalo constituency has forgiven him for his refusal to concentrate on “local projects.” As an ex-quarterback Kemp knew the importance of having a comprehensive game plan. He also knew that politics, like football, is a game of margins. Paradoxes had to be accepted, and some philosophical inconsistencies had to be excused at least for the time being.
So Kemp has always upheld the concept of the Safety Net. He does not talk about getting rid of the Welfare State. His political sense tells him that the best way of reducing welfare payments is to make them unnecessary. Hence his emphasis on the supply-side ideas of Jude Wan-niski and Art Laffer. The supply-side proposition, as elaborated by Kemp in several of his speeches, is this: let potential savings and investment money flow back into the productive mainstream by reducing marginal tax rates. With new industries starting up and prosperity spreading, the amount of taxation needed to sustain the Safety Net would shrink. And, with more people taking care of themselves in private industry, the national budget deficit would disappear.
The anti-supply-side people, including many Republicans, have scoffed at so-called Laffer Curve thinking. So one of Kemp’s major tasks has been to wean Republicans away from their old austerity concepts. “Austerity,” says Kemp, “is not the solution. It is the problem.”
Money and the Market
Some of Kemp’s speeches that criticize the Volcker monetarists are highly technical. But, broadly speaking, Kemp doesn’t think it possible for the monetarists to control the supply of money. “Money,” he says, “is not chosen by economists or government officials. It is chosen by the market, by the common agreement of millions of individuals.” Both the Keynesians and the mo-netarists, in Kemp’s opinion, “have underestimated the degree to which people can and do find ingenious substitutes for whatever definition of money the central bankers are targeting. Witness the explosion of money market funds, overnight re-pos, and overnight Eurodollars, none of which are included in MI.” And there is always the question of the velocity of money, which cannot be predicted on the basis of past history.
Kemp, in several speeches, has called for a return to the gold standard. This would substitute automatic controls that would enable enterprisers to do some long-term planning. To quote Art Laffer, gold convertibility would be “a sort of insurance policy for the quality of money.” But Kemp, thinking in global terms, considers that the return to gold would have to be a decision made at some future Bretton Woods conference of the world’s major economies.
While waiting for his fiat tax proposals to revive enterprise everywhere, Kemp is pushing his concept of enterprise zones. The decaying inner cities, he says, would revive if businesses were to get tax breaks for starting new factories within their confines. The idea has already had a limited success in England. It is no substitute for making the whole North American continent—or, indeed, the world—a huge enterprise zone, but it would bring a certain improvement at the margin. Kemp can’t figure out why the House of Representatives majority dominated by Speaker Tip O’Neill can’t see it.
Kemp goes to Japan for corroboration of his ideas. Japan, he says, has the lowest tax burden of any industrialized country, “29 percent of the economy in 1981, compared with 34 percent in the U.S., 46 percent in France, and 45 percent in West Germany.” Most capital gains in Japan are tax free, and so is the first $12,000 of interest income per person. The personal savings rate in Japan is almost 20 percent.
“Everything depends on incentives,” says Kemp. That is the lesson of his book.